S13: How to Research

Misinformation and China

February 4, 2026

Your Project

About Your Project

Make a one-minute elevator pitch of your research proposal.

  • What are you studying?
  • Why should we care?
  • What’s your original take?
  • What sources or methods will you use?

Project Diagnosis

  • One thing I started / discovered / accomplished
  • One difficulty I ran into

Troubleshooting Your Project

  • Too much to read
  • Too little information
  • Too little time
  • Too many directions

The Library as Database

The Book as Information Technology

First text page of Fust and Schoeffer’s 1467 edition of St. Augustines’s, De arte praedicandi.

Hortus Sanitatis

Read a Book: Step 1

  • Read the table of contents and index
  • What are the main topics of the book?
  • A (good) book’s structure is part of its argument. Can you guess what it is? How does the author develop her claims?

Read a Book: Step 2

  • Read either the introduction and conclusion
  • Scan the subheadings first: A (good) chapter’s structure is part of its argument, too. What’s this?
  • Now try to read with questions in mind.
  • What is the author studying?
  • Why should we care?
  • What’s her original take?
  • What sources or methods does she use?

Read a Book: Step 3

  • Look at the footnotes / endnotes of the chapter
  • Scan bibliography at the end of the book
  • What sources is the author using to make the argument? What are the gaps?
  • Which sources – primary and secondary – are useful for your project? Why?

What do we read when we read a book?

  • Knowledge is personal: filtered info integrated into one’s understanding.
  • Google/AI search gives info; selecting/learning makes it knowledge.

Now Your Turn

  • Make a list of your evidence or primary sources for this chapter (texts, passages, interviews, field notes).
  • Briefly describe each piece. What is it? Why is it here?
  • Reflect: What kind of a collection is this? How will it be helpful for the chapter?

Adjusting your evidence base, argument, or both

Think about:

  • My project’s main examples or case studies
  • Are the claims I make appropriate given the project’s scope and evidence base?

You can:

  • revise the claims to match the evidence I have
  • broaden the evidence or shift the evidence base to match the claims
  • a combination of broadening/shifting evidence and revising claims

Reviewing Your Research Proposal

Empirical

  • What can we learn about X?
  • Time, place, actors, context

Methodological

  • What sources do you need? Can they answer your questions?
  • What’s challenging about them?
  • What’s original about your way of reading them?

Theoretical

  • So what? How does this relate to other times, places, or contexts?
  • How does your case study confirm / nuance / contradict our existing knowledge?

Up next: My action Plan

  • The next factual question I will ask
  • The next thing I will read
  • What do you plan to do with it? Your tentative hypothesis / argument