Misinformation and China
February 13, 2026
In just one paragraph:
The small body of work published so far has focused primarily on how policy is carried out and produces its social effects. How policy gets made is a theoretically and methodologically more challenging question. Today anthropologists are keenly aware of the tight link between knowledge and power, expertise and policy. So far, however, the insights of science and technology studies (STS), the field devoted to understanding how expert knowledge is created and politically advanced, have not been applied to the anthropological study of policy. In this book I seek to empirically expand and theoretically enrich the anthropology of policy by examining the making of public policy and by rethinking the field of policy study through the intellectually productive lens of science studies.
In spite of current concerns about media disinformation, and in light of the frequency and oversimplification with which popular discussions of the topic invokes Nazi Germany, there surprisingly exists no German- or English-language account of the Illustrated Observer. My project offers a much-needed corrective. This case study of the Illustrated Observer shows that while the similarities between media disinformation in interwar Germany and the United States and Russia in the 2020s are striking, so too are the differences and historical contingencies, which frustrate attempts to establish easy parallels.
Grant proposal to the National Endowment for the Humanities
| Structure 1 | Structure 2 | Structure 3 | Structure 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Section 1 | ||||
| Section 2 | ||||
| Section 3 |